January 25, 2012 - 12:03pm

Tomorrow a Committee of the Florida Legislature will take up a bill to make it easier for insurance companies to act in "bad faith" towards their customers. The Bill, filed by Representative Kathleen C. Passidomo, is not only anti-family, but even worse in light of today's economy -- is anti-small business.

The Bill, HB 427, would change current law in Florida by allowing insurance companies to act in bad faith unless and until a ‘civil remedy notice’ was filed, calling them out for bad faith. At that point, if the insurance company offers its policy limits, it will have complete immunity for damages that have been caused to its customer.

The problem with the Bill for small businesses is that laws are already tilted toward the insurance companies. Florida is one of the few states in the country where insurance companies are already permitted to handle claims negligently, with no consequence when it fails to fairly settle a claim and the business is hit with a verdict in excess of its policy limits.

Tampa businessman Bing Kearney, a prominent Republican, has said “I cannot imagine that our legislature would even consider passing this bill. It literally gives a green light to every insurance company to act in bad faith on every single claim. The civil remedy notice requirement gives the insurance company a second chance to get out of the liability but not its customer who is the one that paid for liability protection to begin with."

Kearney further argues that “A business facing a catastrophic claim needs their insurer to live up to all their promises of protection. The Passidomo Bill would give insurance companies this extra 60 days, but not their customers. By then the chance to settle out of court may have passed, so this means the customer ends up paying the entire loss. This bill would protect only one business -- the insurance business – and leave all the rest of us to pay for the clean up of the damages caused by their bad faith.

Another business owner of a small drycleaner and custom tailor in Tampa called Sew Fast has also come out against the Bill. Sew Fast frequently has commercial vehicles on the road, and finds it ‘outrageous’ that its insurance company would even try to get a “free pass” if they exposed to it to an excess claim, after taking premiums for protection, month after month for years.

Several hundred other small businesses have also expressed their opposition to this Bill, despite relatively light coverage by the media.
The bill is also patently anti-family. The Bill will absolutely result in claims being delayed, costs going up, and insurance companies getting protection for acting in bad faith towards their customers.

Even though this issue has not received much attention from the press, it has from the well financed insurance lobby. There have literally been dozens of lobbyists working this bill as part of a well-orchestrated and well-financed campaign.

The Civil Justice Subcommittee is scheduled to take place tomorrow morning. Committee members include Chairman Eric Eisnaugle, Representatives Clay Ford, Richard Steinberg, Bernard Mack, Matt Gaetz, Bill Hager, Shawn Harrison, Marty Kiar, Larry Metz, Darren Soto, Cynthia Stafford, Kelli Stargel, Greg Steube and Michael Weinstein.

And of course Kathleen Passidomo, who will carry Big Insurance's water tomorrow to the cheers of their well paid lobbyists.

October 24, 2011 - 5:05pm

A 45 year old woman was severely injured when her rear right tire suffered a catastrophic tread separation on I-75 in Florida, causing her vehicle to slide into the median where it rolled five times.  Despite wearing her seatbelt, the driver was rendered a quadriplegic.

On October 13, 2011, the Newsome Law Firm won a $13.6 million tread separation verdict for that victim. The Newsome Law Firm alleged that the automotive repair shop and its employees, who inspected the tire months before the crash, overlooked an existing repair in it while repairing another hole. This existing repair, which was improperly carried out, led to the failure of the tire and the subsequent crash.   

Upon inspection of the other tires on the vehicle, several other alarming condition issues were uncovered. These additional issues include the presence of nails and other improper repairs, such as traces of “fix-a-flat” throughout the inside of one tire. These additional issues were overlooked by the automotive repair shop as well.    

The victim’s attorneys pointed out that the improper repair may have been carried out during a busy period for the automotive repair shop. During the trial, one of the defense’s expert witness acknowledged a set of “red flags” the automotive repair shop should have noticed during their final inspection of the SUV.   

August 22, 2011 - 10:40am

According to a Wall Street Journal report this month, automobile maker Honda Motor Co. announced that it will be forced to recall a total of 2.3 million vehicles throughout Canada, China, and the U.S. The problem is said to be tied to automatic transmission failure.

In a press release in early August, Honda claimed that the recall was prompted by thoughts that the vehicles’ transmissions could experience potential damage if the gear of the car is switched periodically and fast. This type of action would likely take place if a car is stuck in mud or elsewhere, needing to go from drive to reverse in quick succession. When this occurs, the complication is known to make the engine stall and inhibit the parking gear.

The recall is focused on the Honda Accord, CR-V and Element models; three of the company’s largest selling vehicles. About 1.5 million Honda automobiles will be recalled in the U.S., while 760,515 will be recalled in China with another 135,142 vehicles in Canada. The recall will include 2005-2010 Accord models, 2007-2010 CR-V models and 2005-2008 Element models. According to figures in the Wall Street Journal report, this will account for nearly 65 percent of the world wide sales for Honda in 2010.

In a recap from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, it was said that the outer shaft bearing in the transmission ran the risk of being broken in some styles of driving. This would then produce odd noises, as well as the malfunction indicator to turn on, running the risk of a short circuit and engine difficulty.  The NHTSA also said that the ball bearing could end up lodged in the parking gear, causing the vehicle to keep rolling, even if it’s in park.

Honda will offer a free recall and fix that will involve updates to the transmission software. Company representatives claim this update will allow all three of the affected Honda models to ease the transition between gears, in turn reducing any possibility of damage to the transmission.  According to reports, they will begin notifying owners at the end of August.

Reference:

Takahashi, Yoshio. (August 6, 2011).“Honda to Recall 2.6 million Vehicles in U.S., China” Retrieved on August 22, 2011 from The Wall Street Journal

July 20, 2011 - 10:49am

In a USA Today report this week, it was said that 75 former NFL players have filed a lawsuit against the league, claiming that they have known the danger of concussions for years and have kept that information away from the players. The suit was said to be filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court, saying that the league knew the harmful effect of concussions as early as the 1920’s.

This litigation comes following the release of an early July report which linked head injuries and trauma to a higher risk of dementia. Within the report, it mentioned specific research on NFL players conducted on nearly 5,000 players in the 2000’s.

The league was apparently caught off guard this week, in the midst of a lockout. Representatives claimed the NFL was unaware of the suit earlier this week. The plaintiff’s will be responsible for presenting a valid argument that proves that the NFL truly knew or should have known about the long term risk of concussions.

It wasn’t until June 2010, that a scientific link between concussions and long term effects in football players started to be recognized by the league. Since this announcement last year, the league has been rather aggressive in their approach, levying more harsh suspensions for severe hits and requiring players to pass a concussion test before coming back to the playing field.

Within the suit, the plaintiffs claim that the NFL conducted a study in 1994, which investigated traumatic brain injury, levying a final report in 2004. In the 2004 conclusion report, the NFL stated that there was no evidence of worsening injury and chronic effects following multiple concussions.

In 2010, the NFL actually acknowledged that multiple concussions can lead to CTE, dementia, memory loss, as well as CTE and related symptoms. Essentially all of the 75 players listed in the suit are alleged to have suffered chronic injuries and illness as a result of concussions accrued during their professional football careers.

Reference:

Davis, Nate. (July 20, 2011). “NFL denies hiding concussion information as alleged in lawsuit.” Retrieved on July 20, 2011 from USA Today.

 

July 19, 2011 - 2:30pm

An MSNBC report this week claims that multiple studies have come out this month showing a link between head injuries and traumatic brain injury to a higher risk of dementia. The report also states that studies within both veterans and former football players have shown an increase in dementia risk.

One study reportedly showed that veterans who were diagnosed with a brain injury are more than twice as likely to get dementia as those who had no prior brain injuries. This news was announced at the Alzheimer’s Association’ International Conference.

The other study in question was focused on retired football players in comparison to the general population. Nearly 35 percent of former NFL players were reported to have signs of dementia, compared to only 13 percent of the general population.

The football study was based off an earlier research program that included around 4,000 NFL players in 2001. This survey was updated in 2008 when research collected information from over 900 players who had since retired and turned 50 years old. In the updated survey in 2008, nearly 35 percent were reported to have cognitive issues.

MSNBC reported that the veteran study was based off the medical records of nearly 300,000 soldiers who received care In VA hospitals from 1997 to 2000 and with one follow up visit in the years afterwards. At the beginning of the study, none of the profiled vets were said to have reported any signs of dementia.

Out of the 280,000 veterans studied, nearly 5,000 of them were diagnosed with some sort of traumatic brain injury. Following the study, this group’s risk of developing dementia totaled about 15 percent, which was nearly 9 percent higher than those without any types of brain injury.  

These two studies continue to add to the mounting reports of head injuries, concussions and their severe long-term consequences. The report states that there has already been controversy surrounding a possible tie to Alzheimer’s risk as well.

The report states that the tie between Alzheimer’s and brain injury shouldn’t come as unexpected. Scientists have stated that with continuous hits to the head, the brain’s communication cables are stretched. When these cables, known as axons, are stretched, structure damage ensues. This structure damage has been known to lead to both dementia and Alzheimer’s cases.

References:

Carroll, Linda. (July 18, 2011). “Brain-injured veterans twice as likely to get dementia.” Retrieved on July 19, 2011 from MSNBC

 

July 19, 2011 - 9:20am

According to a Wall Street Journal Report last week, Chrysler announced that it’s recalling nearly 250,000 Dodge Ram pickup trucks. The models are said to span from 2003 models to 2011 models, relating to a steering control issue.

The trucks are reported to have an issue with the left-side rods breaking, making it possible for the left front of the car to move independently, with no control coming from the steering wheel. This action increased the risk of losing stability and the possibility of more crashes. The tie rods serve to connect the steering control to the front wheels of the vehicle.

Chrysler and Dodge filed a document with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration saying that they altered the design of the tie rod on a number of Ram models to help improve the steering issues. According to the report, Chrysler announced that the breaks happen during low speed, including tight turns. Right now, the issue is said to have affected only “a few “low speed accidents and some minor injuries.

Chrysler had originally told the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that they didn’t think a bulk of their Ram models (2500 and 3500) would experience steering issues. Chrysler announced in March that the two models would need more investigation because there had been an influx in owner reported problems, similar to the 4500 and 5500 models.

The WSJ article claims that the recall will force dealers to inspect the tie rod ends, replace the rod as Chrysler wishes and then do a front end alignment. Customers can easily contact Chrysler with any issues.

This is not the first recent recall for Chrysler, as they released an initial warning focused on similar Dodge pickups in December 2010. Along with almost 250,000 recalls in the United States, it will affect nearly 35,000 trucks in Canada and around 8,500 trucks in the rest of the world.

References:

Welsh, Jonathan. (July 13, 2011). “Chrysler Recalls 242,780 Ram Trucks to Fix Steering.” Retrieved on July 19, 2011 from the Wall Street Journal.

 

July 5, 2011 - 8:00am

According to a USA today report this month, the NFL is currently reviewing the use of sensors on helmets and mouth guards in an attempt to learn more about brain and spinal cord injuries in the future.  The article says that the league’s head, neck and spine committee is using research based at the University of North Carolina to hopefully introduce some new technology to the game in the near future.

The report says that the league is currently reviewing to see if these helmet sensors are reliable, then will hopefully run testing in practice and play on a sample of different players. A compilation of data in the coming years could become league wide and signal the changing of certain rules, in regards to brain and spinal injuries.

The USA today says that the research is taken by test blows on the helmets at different speeds and angles from compressed air. This compression then uses the force of a ramrod in the shape of a helmet to test what would have similar feeling and impact of a game time hit to a football helmet.

The report also states that the helmets and sensors are being tested on hybrid head forms, which unlike dummies can translate data to computers. These hybrid head forms also contain a flexible jaw which allows for the testing of sensors in mouth guards as well. According to the article, this form is covered with a rubber mold which is a close representation of a head and face, while there is also a nylon piece to simulate hair in between the skull and helmet.

The research is being taken on helmet maker Riddell’s newest products, the Revolution and Revolution Speed. The report claims that the sensors on these products use a telemetry system to send wireless data to a computer through frequencies. The report also states that the sensor readings from the helmet, mouthpiece, and head form are reviewed separately.

The study and research is based on the large number of concussions and post retirement brain injuries surrounding the NFL recently. According to the USA Today report, the committee is hoping to run a pilot program on five or six teams in the near future and then hopefully implemented league wide afterwards.

The sensor system has already been tested by the North Carolina football team for nearly six seasons now. According to the report, the results from the trial experiments on the UNC football team have recorded around 250,000 hits in six years. Those involved have stated that players were concussed in numerous different ways and angles of impact.

According to USA Today, researchers will move forward, looking to verify that the helmet sensors properly measure. From that point, they plan to try and find data patterns and present a valid case to the NFL competition committee. As stated in the report, the end goal for the NFL and their head, neck and spine committee is to find a helmet that can help prevent skull fractures and bleeding in the brain.

References:

Mihoces, Gary. (June 17, 2011). “Helmet Sensors Could Soon Measure NFL’s Biggest Hits.” Retrieved on July 5, 2011 from USA Today

June 22, 2011 - 12:55pm

 According to a New York Times article in early June, Toyota has referenced a problem and recall due to the electric steering of 2001-2003 (first generation) Toyota Priuses. The report states that the recall looks to include nearly 52,000 vehicles in the US alone, as well as a total of 106,000 vehicles worldwide.

The article states that there have been some unconfirmed reports of minor accidents relating to the steering issue. While Toyota claimed that the recall was voluntary, the New York Times states that the car manufacturer was required to inform the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration immediately following a recall.

Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of the article is the fact that Toyota has been researching steering issues for nearly four years now. Initial technical reports came in 2007 of a first generation Prius steering wheel locking up.  

According to the report, Toyota discovered loose locking nuts upon their original research into the steering issues. Differing reports gave the car manufacturer a tough time investigating the issue for years. The New York Times report states that the company’s brand engineers were unable to determine a total cause to the steering issues until May 2011, finally prompting the need for a recall.

The news article states that the steering complications are related to the lubrication grease and tightening from the assembly onto the nuts. It also states that since there is a difference between the right and left hand models, the steering wheels in the US wouldn’t stick.

This is not the first time the Prius has been the center of a recall issue. Toyota recalled nearly 1,700 of the 2001 models in 2000 for a power steering issue. Although both recalls involved steering, Toyota representative Brian Lyons disputed any connection between the two, saying “Wednesday’s announcement is not related to the 2000 action.” There are said to have been numerous complaints relating back to steering problems with Priuses from the early 2000’s.

Also in a separate case, Toyota recalled some Venza all wheel drive cars and some Sienna minivans, according to a recent Wall Street Journal Report. Both were related to risk of drive shafts breaking due to an insufficient amount of heat. Unlike the early 2000 Priuses, these are recently developed 2011 models.

References:

Jensen, Christopher. (June 1, 2011). Steering Difficulty Prompts Recall of 52,000 Toyota Priuses. Retrieved on June 22, 2011 from The New York Times

Welsh, Jonathan. (June 1, 2011). Toyota Recalls Older Prius Cars to Fix Steering. Retrieved on June 22, 2011 from The Wall Street Journal

May 23, 2011 - 3:52pm

 The FDA has released an article today detailing proper procedure for handling fresh produce. When you think of food borne illness, typically an association with beef, poultry, and seafood exists. However, the FDA warns that disease can also be spread in several ways through fruits and vegetables.

Contact with other foods, referred to as cross contamination, can be the culprit. For instance, if you were to lay a bed of lettuce on top of uncooked chicken breasts, there is a possibility of spreading salmonella. Poor hygiene is also a main source of food poisoning. If a food handler has not washed their hands correctly and they’ve been in contact with harmful bacteria, or spread any bodily fluid directly to the produce, they encourage an environment conducive to the growth of the bacteria. Even during the growth of fruits and vegetables, the soil or water used in the process could be contaminated, then spreading to the entire plant, including seeds.

In the fight against brain and spinal cord injury, it is especially important to understand the danger of food borne illness. The CDC also released recent findings dealing with this particular topic and its association to human prion disease. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE ), better known as “Mad Cow Disease,” Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), and chronic wasting disease (CWD), are all a form of prion disease contracted through unsafe food consumption. They almost always result in fatality, as they all affect the brain directly. Some side effects include deteriorating movement and motor skills, dementia, and loss of memory.

However, something as simple as increasing how we monitor cross contamination of produce and meat could prevent an endemic. The CDC wants the FDA to crack down on the implementation and enforcement of practices for proper food handling.
Fortunately, several ways to manage these risks exist. The FDA advises individuals to stay away from bruised or damage produce, as these fruits and vegetables could already be harboring agents of food borne illness. Also, consumers are encouraged to make sure that pre-cut fruits and vegetables are refrigerated or stored on ice prior to purchase, and kept to the same standard before serving. Here is a list of the specific tips from the FDA to mitigate the risk of spreading and contracting food borne illness:

  • Wash your hands for 20 seconds with warm water and soap before and after preparing fresh produce.
  • Cut away any damaged or bruised areas before preparing or eating.
  • Gently rub produce while holding under plain running water. There’s no need to use soap or a produce wash.
  • Wash produce BEFORE you peel it, so dirt and bacteria aren’t transferred from the knife onto the fruit or vegetable.
  • Use a clean vegetable brush to scrub firm produce, such as melons and cucumbers.
  • Dry produce with a clean cloth or paper towel to further reduce bacteria that may be present.
  • Throw away the outermost leaves of a head of lettuce or cabbage.

References:

Costanzo, Francesca. (2011, May 23). CDC Assesses Potential Human Exposure To Prion Diseases. EurekAlert! - Science News. Retrieved May 23, 2011, from EurekAlert

FDA. (2011, May 23). 7 Tips for Cleaning Fruits, Vegetables. U S Food and Drug Administration Home Page. Retrieved May 23, 2011, from FDA

May 16, 2011 - 1:30pm

On May 12th, four papers were released in the American Journal of Public Health regarding the effect a ban on menthol flavoring in cigarette production would have. Each paper features different studies on tobacco use in the United States, and questions what results a ban might produce. According to Medical News Today, “One paper describes a study that ran computer models and estimated that if a ban were to be introduced now, it could prevent more than 600,000 premature American deaths by 2050…”

Findings from another paper report that 4 out of 5 African American cigarette users smoke menthol cigarettes, and a separate study from the National Cancer Institute discovered 39% of all menthol smokers (which includes more than half of all African American menthol smokers) would discontinue smoking entirely if a ban was placed on menthol cigarettes. Statistics from multiple studies suggest that African Americans are suffering more than any other demographic due to damage from the intake of menthol cigarettes. Dr. David Abrams, who is the executive director of the Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Legacy, assisted with 3 of the 4 papers as well as a separate study on menthol tobacco users. He issued the following statement to the press:

“Tobacco is not an equal-opportunity killer, and the link between menthol smoking and African Americans cannot be overemphasized, nor can it be overlooked.” 

The taste of menthol encourages young and non-smokers to take up the harmful habit, and researchers are begging the FDA to implement a ban. New discoveries are still being made concerning the damaging effects caused by cigarette use. In July of 2009, the Journal of Neurochemistry released a study on the link between brain damage and smoking. Science Daily published an article about the results, stating, “Researchers, led by Debapriya Ghosh and Dr Anirban Basu from the Indian National Brain Research Center (NBRC), have found that a compound in tobacco provokes white blood cells in the central nervous system to attack healthy cells, leading to severe neurological damage.”

The study involved introducing mice to tobacco use, and then exploring the subjects’ brain and cell activity. The researchers found that the normal pattern of microglia, the brain’s immune cells, tend to change when tobacco is used. This causes those cells to attack healthy cells, instead of destroying harmful cells as usual. "This research sheds light on the processes that lead to nerve cell damage in those who smoke cigarettes or consume tobacco products on regular basis," said Ghosh.

References:

Paddock, C. (2011, May 12). Calls To Ban Menthol Cigarettes, US. Medical News Today: Health News. Retrieved May 16, 2011, from http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/225297.php

Wiley - Blackwell (2009, June 23). Smoking Linked To Brain Damage. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 16, 2011, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090623090400.htm